Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Majestic 50. Worth the gamble?
#1

I was up at an antique mall this afternoon and ran across a virtually complete Majestic 50 tombstone radio along with its original stand for $100. Other than the missing back panel, the radio was 100% complete and both it and the stand looked nice. The only thing that held me back was that the tuner seems stuck! I know Majestics have some pot metal in the tuners and this caused me to pass on the set, even though it's one I have wanted for a while. Now I am wondering, would it have been worth the gamble for the price? How often would one of these been found with its optional stand. I know if the 45's test good, that would just about cover the cost of the set.

No matter where you go, there you are.
#2

Jayce, you hit the spot on what to worry about. I redid a FADA 46 but was fortunate that the pot metal was only used on the bearings of the VC and the knob that turned it. After a lot of work removing stuff and reaming the bearings all was well. I understand that some Majestics use the pot metal in the frame of the VC. I suspect that might be really bad. I'm certain others here have had experience with that model.
Jerry

A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
#3

The stand wasn't optional, as far as I know.

I have a spare chassis you could have gratis, but you'd have to pick it up (or have it picked up) here.
#4

Almost winter most places, initial cost less than a decent dinner for two, I'd go for it.
#5

(11-02-2015, 07:03 PM)Jayce Wrote:  I was up at an antique mall this afternoon and ran across a virtually complete Majestic 50 tombstone radio along with its original stand for $100. Other than the missing back panel, the radio was 100% complete and both it and the stand looked nice. The only thing that held me back was that the tuner seems stuck! I know Majestics have some pot metal in the tuners and this caused me to pass on the set, even though it's one I have wanted for a while. Now I am wondering, would it have been worth the gamble for the price? How often would one of these been found with its optional stand. I know if the 45's test good, that would just about cover the cost of the set.

Jayce;
 I don't know if the Majestic model 50s were one of the models that used pot metal in the tuning cap or no, or whether they were known to cause problems. Most of the U.S Majestics from then used chassis that were almost identical to Canadian built Rogers and Majestic models that never seem to have serious pot metal problems. I seem to recall that there were some Majestic models that look like a tombstone set sitting on a small table but the "table" is actually part of the cabinet, the model 50 was one I think. One thing that all of these sets have in common is the rotting rubber/gutta percha insulated wiring, so they can be a bit time consuming to restore because of that. If the missing back panel was originally wood I wouldn't let that stop you, if it was like a metal back that could be a bit of a pain to replace so I would price accordingly.
 Used #45 tubes aren't worth as much as you think, the audiophools want NOS ones and in matched pairs, even if they were both weak or dead you can find used ST style ones fairly reasonably so I would not let that hold you back if you really like the set. Maybe you could see if they will take an offer on the radio, see if you can beat them down $25 or more.
Regards
Arran




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Part numbers to model cross
Thank you morzh, that is exactly what I was looking for. Now , is there some where that shows pinouts for Philco power ...Jim Dutridge — 11:37 AM
Restoration of the Canadian General Electric A-87
Thanks for your help Michael. In fact, this video is only an intermediate result. Later I had to apply another tinting l...RadioSvit — 09:01 AM
Restoration of the Canadian General Electric A-87
Great job on the cabinet. PS. In the US notation, "kenotron" refers to specific type of tubes; we call re...morzh — 08:24 AM
Part numbers to model cross
This document has at least some tables of models and parts used. Example: Choke 32-7572, used in 604 radio. Search f...morzh — 08:19 AM
Restoration of the Canadian General Electric A-87
I also checked all the radio tubes on my Hickok 530 tube tester. The 5Z3 kenotron turned out to be faulty, all the other...RadioSvit — 08:02 AM
Restoration of the Canadian General Electric A-87
Well... While the varnish is drying up, I started repairing the chassis... Of course I started by replacing the pa...RadioSvit — 07:12 AM
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Hello Martin, Welcome aboard our little community what great Model 38-7 Sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:30 AM
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Welcome to the Phorum Martin. I count about 9 paper caps, the 3 electrolytic caps and 2-Y2 safety caps to replace th...RodB — 09:44 PM
Part numbers to model cross
Jim, We have this index put together by Dale Cook but I don't think that is quite what you are looking for. The Parts...klondike98 — 09:37 PM
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
Yep the dim bulb test is OK but I'd definitely replace all those electrolytics before I did it. Since those #47 conden...klondike98 — 09:18 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1201 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 1200 Guest(s)
Avatar

>