smoke escaping from resistors
Posts: 16,582
Threads: 574
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
Arran
I thought you suggested the smoking occurs due to the field coil being disconnected.
If it is connected, anything can be the reason, and I thought of RF 78 tube shorts.
Part #19 short (if the field coil IS connected) would require also some short in the Det. oscillator tube, but even this will not reault in #7 smoking as it is serialized with some 50Kohms resistance and the drop on it (again, if #19 is at fault) would be so small (0.5% of the total voltage), it is far from causing anything like 200 Ohms resistor (also probably 1/2W) to smoke.
If #61/62 do smoke, this indeed may be (potentially) due to the field coil missing; #7 - unlikely.
I would say, if #7 smokes with the field coil removed, it will smoke with the coil in place too.
I would look for shorts in wiring - the schematic does not show any path that can do it.
Posts: 41
Threads: 12
Joined: Jan 2012
City: Cape Cod, MA
OK finally an update. Had a chace to power up with the field coil plugged in, no more smoke. It appears that this was causing the load on #7. However no sound or hum. Now that I can power up and leave the power on, I will check voltages and it looks like I have a tube or two that may be questionable. Now all I need is some time.
Posts: 4,950
Threads: 54
Joined: Sep 2008
City: Sandwick, BC, CA
(03-18-2012, 11:20 AM)morzh Wrote: Arran
I thought you suggested the smoking occurs due to the field coil being disconnected.
If it is connected, anything can be the reason, and I thought of RF 78 tube shorts.
Part #19 short (if the field coil IS connected) would require also some short in the Det. oscillator tube, but even this will not reault in #7 smoking as it is serialized with some 50Kohms resistance and the drop on it (again, if #19 is at fault) would be so small (0.5% of the total voltage), it is far from causing anything like 200 Ohms resistor (also probably 1/2W) to smoke.
If #61/62 do smoke, this indeed may be (potentially) due to the field coil missing; #7 - unlikely.
I would say, if #7 smokes with the field coil removed, it will smoke with the coil in place too.
I would look for shorts in wiring - the schematic does not show any path that can do it.
Well then you explain it? You are shooting down one of my theories, which is little more then a guess anyhow, but you haven't come up with any other explaination that hasn't been though of, as to why part #7, the 200 ohm resistor, is burning up. I did also mention that there may be a wiring error or a stray blob of solder etc. that could cause it. Part number #19 is directly in the path of the B+ voltage along with part #21, part #22, and part #14, there is no other path for the B+ voltage to get to part #7 as part #7 is in the cathode circuit of the 78 and 6A7 tubes.
With no load on the B+ line in that branch of the B+ circuit the voltage will be high and behave like the resistors #21 and #22 weren't even there and possibly cause the dielectric of part #19 to break down and short out. Again short of a wiring error there is no other direct path to that 200 ohm resistor. Another possibility is that the field coil being missing, somehow caused the cathode current to increase, but that doesn't make much sense since the only way that could happen is if the plate and screen voltages were there and the grid bias voltages were not. But when it comes to antique radios, the age of the components and tampering by former service persons means they sometimes do whacky things that are not easy to explain.
Regards
Arran
Posts: 16,582
Threads: 574
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
(03-19-2012, 12:29 AM)Arran Wrote: (03-18-2012, 11:20 AM)morzh Wrote: Arran
I thought you suggested the smoking occurs due to the field coil being disconnected.
If it is connected, anything can be the reason, and I thought of RF 78 tube shorts.
Part #19 short (if the field coil IS connected) would require also some short in the Det. oscillator tube, but even this will not reault in #7 smoking as it is serialized with some 50Kohms resistance and the drop on it (again, if #19 is at fault) would be so small (0.5% of the total voltage), it is far from causing anything like 200 Ohms resistor (also probably 1/2W) to smoke.
If #61/62 do smoke, this indeed may be (potentially) due to the field coil missing; #7 - unlikely.
I would say, if #7 smokes with the field coil removed, it will smoke with the coil in place too.
I would look for shorts in wiring - the schematic does not show any path that can do it.
Well then you explain it? You are shooting down one of my theories, which is little more then a guess anyhow, but you haven't come up with any other explaination that hasn't been though of, as to why part #7, the 200 ohm resistor, is burning up. I did also mention that there may be a wiring error or a stray blob of solder etc. that could cause it. Part number #19 is directly in the path of the B+ voltage along with part #21, part #22, and part #14, there is no other path for the B+ voltage to get to part #7 as part #7 is in the cathode circuit of the 78 and 6A7 tubes.
With no load on the B+ line in that branch of the B+ circuit the voltage will be high and behave like the resistors #21 and #22 weren't even there and possibly cause the dielectric of part #19 to break down and short out. Again short of a wiring error there is no other direct path to that 200 ohm resistor. Another possibility is that the field coil being missing, somehow caused the cathode current to increase, but that doesn't make much sense since the only way that could happen is if the plate and screen voltages were there and the grid bias voltages were not. But when it comes to antique radios, the age of the components and tampering by former service persons means they sometimes do whacky things that are not easy to explain.
Regards
Arran
Arran,
I was saying something before (mentioning shorts in wiring) that completely agrees with your notion of wiring error: it is, like you said, either wiring (error/short due to old wiring) or solder blob.
But if you look at the sch, if the wiring is intact, you yourself can see that there's no way in heck the absence of the field coil can create the smoking of #7, unless there are pre-existing conditions (just mentioned by you and me). A tube short is possible also, but first there have to be other shorts, so a shorted tube can create this if the plate power is absent.
I mean no disrespect.
Mike.
Posts: 41
Threads: 12
Joined: Jan 2012
City: Cape Cod, MA
What about the antenna tranformer not being plugged into the chassis? Would that solve the mystery with #7 burning?
Posts: 16,582
Threads: 574
Joined: Oct 2011
City: Jackson
State, Province, Country: NJ
(03-20-2012, 01:06 PM)raydog Wrote: What about the antenna tranformer not being plugged into the chassis? Would that solve the mystery with #7 burning?
By the Antenna transformer do you mean #3? (it is easier if you refer by position numbers).
No, that won't burn anything.
1. Here's the thing: all the tubes seem to connect through what essentially is a piece of wire (coils) for the DC current to the Plate voltage. So, yes, make the bias right and your resistor will smoke.
For this one to smoke quickly you will need probably several watts (don't know the rating), with 1 Watt being dissipated at about 70mA of current.
The problem is, you've disconnected the field coil. Without this coil there is (if we assume everything is intact, no shorts etc) NO power whatsoever to burn anything near #7.
This is why you can do whatever with your grids' biases - it won't hurt.
2. Now, if it smokes, there are probably shorts.
3. The single DC path to the RF 78 tube with the Field Coil disconnected is #55 resistor (32Kohms). If we are to assume it is intact, and IS 32Kohms, there is not enough current to burn anything, as it is about 10-12mA tops without any loads.
If however it is burned in the "low-resistance" mode, there may be more.
But: you have to have the tube IN the socket and it has to be shorted itself.
With the tube pulled out this path does not exist either.
4. You need to take your meter, disconnect the parts that smoke and start measuring, seeing where the voltage comes from.
Does it still smoke without RF 78 tube in place? WHat are the plate voltages? etc etc.
The usual approach to smoking situation is: follow the current path. Find the power source.
And, of course - be careful and safe.
Users browsing this thread:
|
Recent Posts
|
Part numbers to model cross
|
That I wouldn't know, but sometimes the radio document itself shows one, same as the capacitor cans' etc pinouts.morzh — 12:46 PM |
Part numbers to model cross
|
Thank you morzh, that is exactly what I was looking for. Now , is there some where that shows pinouts for Philco power ...Jim Dutridge — 11:37 AM |
Restoration of the Canadian General Electric A-87
|
Thanks for your help Michael. In fact, this video is only an intermediate result. Later I had to apply another tinting l...RadioSvit — 09:01 AM |
Restoration of the Canadian General Electric A-87
|
Great job on the cabinet.
PS. In the US notation, "kenotron" refers to specific type of tubes; we call re...morzh — 08:24 AM |
Part numbers to model cross
|
This document has at least some tables of models and parts used.
Example: Choke 32-7572, used in 604 radio.
Search f...morzh — 08:19 AM |
Restoration of the Canadian General Electric A-87
|
I also checked all the radio tubes on my Hickok 530 tube tester. The 5Z3 kenotron turned out to be faulty, all the other...RadioSvit — 08:02 AM |
Restoration of the Canadian General Electric A-87
|
Well... While the varnish is drying up, I started repairing the chassis...
Of course I started by replacing the pa...RadioSvit — 07:12 AM |
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
|
Hello Martin,
Welcome aboard our little community what great Model 38-7
Sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:30 AM |
Philco Model 38-7: what caps & resistors do fail typically?
|
Welcome to the Phorum Martin.
I count about 9 paper caps, the 3 electrolytic caps and 2-Y2 safety caps to replace th...RodB — 09:44 PM |
Part numbers to model cross
|
Jim,
We have this index put together by Dale Cook but I don't think that is quite what you are looking for.
The Parts...klondike98 — 09:37 PM |
Who's Online
|
There are currently 1531 online users. [Complete List] » 1 Member(s) | 1530 Guest(s)
|
|
|

|