Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

48-485
#1

Should I be interested at $70?  Not many made.  AM only.
#2

My opinion: Meh... Icon_thumbdown

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

I think it's ugly, but if it were rare and desirable....
#4

Rare: possibly. Desirable: no. Ugly: definitely.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#5

For those of use following at home this is the set in question:  https://philcoradio.com/gallery2/1948b/#Model_48-485
[Image: https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/sm...mbdown.gif][Image: https://philcoradio.com/phorum/images/sm...n_yawn.gif]

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#6

It didn't sell well when new... that should tell you something. Sometimes it is enough to see history only documented. Just my opinion. Take care, Gary

"Don't pity the dead, pity the living, above all, those living without love."
Professor Albus Dumbledore
Gary - Westland Michigan
#7

Gary is (IMO) exactly right. Why would folks want to pay $119 in 1948 for an AM-only console radio when FM and TV were the latest, greatest things in electronics? Sure, consoles with FM, and TV sets, cost a lot more at the time but still...

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#8

Thanks guys. No way I'm going after it.
#9

For a similar amount of money one can buy a 48-482, with AM, FM, and SW. It is a lot more versatile radio, a fine performer, and, being a table model, is more practical in most modern homes. I love the one I have restored. When I first moved from Rhode Island to Tennessee, and was waiting for sixteen months to get connected to the internet, it was my main source of entertainment and news. I played it for hours every day. Since then I have bought 2 more complete radios, as well as a chassis. Someday I'm going to refurbish at least one more of these fine radios.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Electrolytic restuffing/internals
Did as suggested. Cut can with hacksaw, removed internals, attached new 8mf cap - with ample use of cardboard and elec...bridkarl — 03:36 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
For fans of antique radio... My new video... How to test radio tubes on a Hickok 530B tube tester? Test radio tubes o...RadioSvit — 01:25 PM
philcorepairbench.com - shadow-meter
Thank you Billpoulsbobill — 11:53 AM
philcorepairbench.com - shadow-meter
Hi, Try here Philco Service Hints & Tips, Number 1 It's from the web archive (Way Back Machine).Keith — 10:17 AM
PT-6 finished!!
Hi Arran,  Yes, you are correct, the "nominal" voltage for these Loctal tubes was the same 6.3 or 12.6 V as...MrFixr55 — 07:48 AM
PT-6 finished!!
Actually the Loctal tube series, with number beginning with "14" are 12.6 volt tubes, at 150 ma, I'm not sure ...Arran — 02:14 AM
philco predicta
The model is the holiday without UHF It has no sound and I don't have an oscilloscope or signal generator.cgl18 — 08:51 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I will definitely check my lead length and wire dressing. Thanks for the ideas.Stormlord5500 — 08:06 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Do make sure that you twist the 3 wires from the chassis to the transformer, and dress away from tubes, especially audio...MrFixr55 — 07:38 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
The cone unfortunately got damaged when I removed it. The glue that held the cone to the basket was sloppily applied and...Stormlord5500 — 07:12 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>