Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Motorola Model SP-29 3 Channel Suitcase Record Player
#1

Hello everyone, I was given a few years ago a 1962 Motorola Model SP-29 3 channel Suitcase Record Player that works with all of its original compnents yet (minus one tube which was original when I got it but was microphonic so I had to replace it with a NOS RCA tube). 

My question is, how rare is this record player and how much could this record player be sold for potentially? 

I ask this because I have scoured epay off and on over the past few years and I have yet to see another record player like mine for sale on there or that had sold on there, and I was curious as to whether or not this thing was a rare model? I have seen many console versions of my record player but not any other suitcase versions like mine.

What I do know about this model is that it was apparently the last tube model that Motorola made before switching over to Solid State in 1963.

See pictures below.


Attached Files Image(s)
                   
#2

No one has any comment on this unit?
#3

Sorry, not familiar.
#4

Seems you're not the only one...  Icon_confused

I've tried to look up info on this unit and not much come up about it, not even any recently sold ebay listings.

There was some service information for this record player out there, it came from the 1962 Beitman's Manual but I didn't see anything in Sam's from what I could see.
#5

I remember a couple of Motorola 3 Channel consoles when I was a kid, and fixed one once. I think that the "3 Channel" concept was popular with Motorola consoles and rather unique to them. The theory was to concentrate the program to the high power, usually push pull center channel while the left and right channels provide the stereo ambiance. I don't remember if there were any low / high pass filters dividing up the programming between center and left / right channels. One theory, very popular now with home surround sound systems, is that people cannot determine the direction of sound lower in frequency than 300 Hz.

Based on the tube layout sticker on your unit, the center channel using 2 6BM8 Tubes (Triode preamp, Pentode Output) accentuated the lower frequencies, while 2 6BM8 Triode Pentode tubes provided single end left and right channels. a 12AX7 served as a Stereo Preamp Tone Control Amp. Total "undistorted" power of this Unit was likely 10 watts. True HiFi? No. Sweet? Yes!


The turntable on this unit is a VOM (Voice of Music), a very popular turntable, not as high end as the Collaro used by Magnavox, or the better Garrards, but very popular and of good quality. There is a Voice of Music Website and much can be found on the internet regarding these turntables. The biggest issues for this and any turntable of this vintage are dried grease, deteriorated Capstan Wheel (the "tire" that drives the turntable) and deterioration of the ceramic cartridge. Magnetic stereo cartridges were reserved for very expensive, true HiFi systems such as Fisher, Scott, etc., that cost one quarter to one half the cost of a new car in the late 1950s to very early 60s.

This is a a rather high end portable for the time, as very few portables of any manufacturer were transformer powered. Fix this up, this is a true keeper!

As a child, we had a Voice of Music stereo portable, physically larger than your Motorola. Each speaker cabinet, hinged to the main cabinet, held 2 6" Speakers. The Amp was a 12AX7 preamp with 2 50L6 SE Output amps. The output transformers were large for this type of amp and it was powered by a solid state (silicon) half wave voltage doubler power supply. My brother bas the speakers, but the rest of it was lost, as it was obsoleted by the much newer, more powerful solid state stuff. I would have saved the amp but its layout did not lend to repackaging. Considering how much people on eBuy pay for SE Amp Output transformers, let alone tube amps, even of this type, I am kicking myself for not saving it, not just from getting some cash for it but because another person would have enjoyed it, as much as we enjoy our antique electronic finds.

"Do Justly, love Mercy and walk humbly with your God"- Micah 6:8
"Let us begin to do good"- St. Francis

Best Regards, 

MrFixr55




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
PT 6 chassis screws size???
Hello bridKarl, that sounds right or maybe 8/32 . Sincerely Richardradiorich — 01:00 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
Have this done except for missing chassis screws. It looks like 1 inch 6/32 sheet metal screw may work but can anyone s...bridkarl — 10:32 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Hello Stormlord, Well done on rewinding that coil it turned fairly good for your first one. Sincerely Richardradiorich — 09:12 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Well here it is. It ain't pretty, but hopefully it'll work. I checked it with my DMM on continuity and it keeps and r...Stormlord5500 — 08:56 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Yes, 57 is an electrolytic cap that should be 12 mfd 400 volts according to the parts list from the Phorum library schem...RodB — 06:01 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Looks like if I am reading it correctly it looks like the silver capacitor#57 that appears to be a replacement is of a l...osanders0311 — 05:09 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Thanks Arran. Yeah this plastic is pretty thin. It's a little thinner than the original stuff. It kinda reminds me of p...Stormlord5500 — 04:37 PM
Testing a speaker and output transformer Trutone A2-G
The equivalent of one short turn is basically the same as that of a shorted load. If it is the primary's turn, then the ...morzh — 03:53 PM
Testing a speaker and output transformer Trutone A2-G
I've never had an output transformer become shorted, the failure mode is usually an open primary, or in a center tapped ...Arran — 03:52 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
As long as the plastic sheeting isn't too thick, I think that the thickness of photographic film would be just about rig...Arran — 03:19 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>