Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

I do not care what anyone says
#1

Listen guys.. I do will not change my mind on what anyone else puts on this board, But my 38-116 console in my own radio collection is the best sounding radio I own... And Thanks to all your help insisting I change out a couple of tubes that might have been weak! Thanks again. Would love too know how the other owners think about their console...
#2

My 38-116 is probably my best sounding console.It will probably improve bass when I build a back for it.I'll eventually restore my 1947 Magnavox Belvedere and suspect it will give the Philco a challenge. Later Hi Fi AM radios in my collection are excluded from the comparison.
#3

PJ, I restored one electrically for a friend but never got to listen to it in the cabinet with the back. It sounded really nice with the speaker setting on the bench. I would guess great in the cabinet with the back. Really a great radio.
Jerry

A friend in need is a pest!  Bill Slee ca 1970.
#4

second best sounding AM radio I own.
#5

Mine is excellent. It plays as well as my 38-690 and they are my two best players. I am lucky to have each.

Steve
#6

Steve.... What would you say the difference is between the 690 and the 116.. I do not think I will not be so lucky to find a 690 for a reasonable cost. And I dont think I will ever hear one up close to hear the difference. What would you say the difference is since you have both consoles.... Thanks in advance ......
#7

And Steve you are lucky to have both. Enjoy them and If you can send use a pic or two of both your radios.
#8

I am out of town this week so I'll send pics next week. I really can't tell the difference in sound quality between the two. They both play very well. I don't think you are missing much with a 38 116 from the 690. The 690 uses a pot for bass control (left side switch). That may be the only real difference that I could tell as I can really vary the bass anyway I want.

Steve




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Electrolytic restuffing/internals
Did as suggested. Cut can with hacksaw, removed internals, attached new 8mf cap - with ample use of cardboard and elec...bridkarl — 03:36 PM
The list of my radio & TV collection!
For fans of antique radio... My new video... How to test radio tubes on a Hickok 530B tube tester? Test radio tubes o...RadioSvit — 01:25 PM
philcorepairbench.com - shadow-meter
Thank you Billpoulsbobill — 11:53 AM
philcorepairbench.com - shadow-meter
Hi, Try here Philco Service Hints & Tips, Number 1 It's from the web archive (Way Back Machine).Keith — 10:17 AM
PT-6 finished!!
Hi Arran,  Yes, you are correct, the "nominal" voltage for these Loctal tubes was the same 6.3 or 12.6 V as...MrFixr55 — 07:48 AM
PT-6 finished!!
Actually the Loctal tube series, with number beginning with "14" are 12.6 volt tubes, at 150 ma, I'm not sure ...Arran — 02:14 AM
philco predicta
The model is the holiday without UHF It has no sound and I don't have an oscilloscope or signal generator.cgl18 — 08:51 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I will definitely check my lead length and wire dressing. Thanks for the ideas.Stormlord5500 — 08:06 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Do make sure that you twist the 3 wires from the chassis to the transformer, and dress away from tubes, especially audio...MrFixr55 — 07:38 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
The cone unfortunately got damaged when I removed it. The glue that held the cone to the basket was sloppily applied and...Stormlord5500 — 07:12 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 837 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 836 Guest(s)
Avatar

>