Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12, 2025) x

Thread Closed

Philco 90: expecting too much?
#10

Ron Ramirez Wrote:Yes - 1000 ohms/volt was the standard for many years. 20K ohms/volt is much better, and the modern DMMs are in the 1 meg/volt or better range.

Just to clarify Very old volt ohm meters were 1K per volt. I would suspect these where used for testing B batteries. The meter would load the battery and give better more accurate reading under a load and 1000 ohms would do it. Most radio circuits you don't want to load. It will give you an inaccurate reading. Later I'm guessing late 1920's better vom's 10k and 20k per volt. Vtvm ( vacuum tube voltmeter) and Dmm (digital multi meter) all are 1meg per volt or better (higher). Personal preference is use dmm for resistor. Very accurate. Use vtvm for voltage. Two reasons: 1 Problaby what was use when set was made to measure the voltages that are on the documentation. 2 Dmm's sometimes can give an incorrect reading. They are sensitive to any sort of signal that maybe be mixed in with the voltage you are measuring. This happens a lot with measuring voltages on TV's and things like ham transmitters. This can be very frustrating!!!
I'm jumping off my soap box.
Terry

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got it!

Terry


Messages In This Thread
Philco 90: expecting too much? - by Guest - 02-05-2010, 01:28 AM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by Guest - 02-05-2010, 08:41 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by Guest - 02-06-2010, 11:34 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by exray - 02-07-2010, 09:48 AM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by 7estatdef - 02-07-2010, 04:01 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by 7estatdef - 02-07-2010, 04:19 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by 7estatdef - 02-07-2010, 05:07 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by codefox1 - 02-07-2010, 05:45 PM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by Guest - 02-08-2010, 12:27 AM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by 7estatdef - 02-08-2010, 08:59 AM
Re: Philco 90: expecting too much? - by codefox1 - 02-09-2010, 06:31 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco P45-6365 Universal Transformer Instruction Manual
Can anyone guide me to where this may be found?GRG — 03:00 PM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
I don't think that I have encountered a 12Z3 before, curious how it uses one of those but includes a #43, which is a 25 ...Arran — 02:17 PM
HiFi (Chifi) tube amp build - but my own design.
It's the other forum. I'm also in DIY, but mostly read there. Honestly, I kinda jumped into this without much thought to...TV MAN — 10:43 AM
Philco 71 Code 125
Hello,  I am in need of a schematic for this radio. Mine has the three separate circular tube shields and a shadow me...dconant — 08:06 AM
Stromberg Carlson 1500 Squeal
And life just keeps getting more complicated.dconant — 07:57 AM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Hello Roy, here is this one sincerely Richardradiorich — 12:45 AM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Richard, Had grabbed it already but thank you just the same.  I find myself wanting to find some way to block out the...glyphmon — 12:03 AM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Hello roy, here is a link to the schematic . Sincerely Richardradiorich — 11:54 PM
54C Complete Teardown/Rebuild
Richard, The Silvertone 2014 also is a transformerless set, so I am incorporating a 1:1 600 ohm audio isolation transfo...glyphmon — 11:37 PM
Preliminary work on wife's Silvertone 2014
Did an alignment today which was interesting.  IF alignment went great, almost all was already spot-on.  Adjusting on th...glyphmon — 11:35 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>