Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 42-1016
#6

That's correct Ron... and... the speed is 33 1/3, and the "talking record" speed was 16 2/3, or half that speed. I remember the 16 2/3 was used a lot back in the 1950s and 1960s for recording books for the blind. I remember these records in the library, along with special heavy duty type record players.

Most people in this Phorum are too old to remember the big battle between RCA and Columbia over record speeds. Columbia came out with 33 1/3 records just before WW2, but paused their introduction during the war because nobody was making players, all manufacturing had turned to war production. They came back out with them after the war, when consumer production resumed. RCA came out with 45 RPM records right after, which they had been developing just before the war while Columbia was developing the 33 1/3. They claimed, correctly, that the 45 was capable of better fidelity, which it is because the groove vibrations from side to side are longer for a given frequency at the higher RPM. Remember, this was still in the days of monaural records. Anyway, both systems survived. The 33 1/3 became the standard for long playing albums. It was especially good for classical music recordings since they could fit an entire movement of a symphony on one side. RCA did make long playing 45s with microgrooves, but they only lasted 7 1/2 minutes at most per side. RCA even came out with some 45 "albums" with 2 songs on each side of the record, and 2 or 3 records in the box. Eventually the 45 became the standard for "singles" while the 33 1/3 became the standard for albums. My family were quite familiar with all this since my godmother started as a secretary for, and eventually became a vice president of RCA Camden. I still have more than a dozen of the boxed 45 "albums" from those early days.


Messages In This Thread
Philco 42-1016 - by fmlondon - 08-28-2021, 01:31 AM
RE: Philco 42-1016 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-28-2021, 09:07 AM
RE: Philco 42-1016 - by BrendaAnnD - 08-28-2021, 09:22 AM
RE: Philco 42-1016 - by morzh - 08-28-2021, 06:15 PM
RE: Philco 42-1016 - by Ron Ramirez - 08-28-2021, 07:26 PM
RE: Philco 42-1016 - by mikethedruid - 08-28-2021, 08:09 PM
RE: Philco 42-1016 - by fmlondon - 08-28-2021, 09:44 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Hi OSanders, Look carefully at the band switch. Turn it slowly and "wiggle" it around the desired band. ...MrFixr55 — 12:33 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
I think that RCA and GE introduced metal tubes in the USA in 1936.  I don't know if they were being made by RCA, GE or b...MrFixr55 — 11:20 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Vlad95, Thank you for the stringing guides and wow there are so manyosanders0311 — 06:01 PM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
A pre war Hallicrafters, and an early one too, very nice! 1936 is pretty early for metal tubes too, which would explain ...Arran — 05:58 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Thanks Rod, "When you hear the background hiss and no station it usually indicates that the oscillator quit" ...osanders0311 — 05:52 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
RodB :beerchug:Vlad95 — 10:22 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Vlad, you nailed it. Swiss and German roots.RodB — 09:54 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
Well this is a Hallicrafters SX/9 circa 1936. No real issues so far although I dodged a real bullet with a cap that was...bridkarl — 07:59 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
The pinout is the same but the 5U4 has a 3 amp filament, verses 2 amps or less on the 5Z4. I think that the pinout of a ...Arran — 12:04 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
By the way. osanders0311 Take a look here: Dial cord stringing Guides May be here you can fount correct string settin...Vlad95 — 11:15 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1261 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 1258 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>