Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Atwater Kent 82, restoration.
#16

Rich

>> What a nice-looking chassis I would grabbed it too .


Yeah.....and there was the rest of the radio attached to it too! Also nice-looking! Icon_lol



Rod

So far. I do not wanto to jinx things, but the guy who sold it to me said "I restored it, it works". Well, I am sure it works in the way in might even pull stations and speak, but as "restored it", considering the only two parts replaced are the two electrolytic caps, and the replacements are "Philco-Ford" (likely made before I was born), I would hardly call it "restoration". And the power cord is original, even though it is not falling apart, but it needs replacement also.

The "special" in AKs is their capacitor cans, which need to be opened. Unlike the 808A, this one has several smaller ones.

But the parts are higher quality than the Philco's. Even the flexible resistors are better made and even look sturdier, including the end terminations. The ones by Philco are easily detached, often on their own.
No, no, I am not maligning Philco; theirs, especially when compared to many that came after them is good quality, but that's just that, good. AK's is superb. Just the tube panels are something.

Well, I guess this was one of the factors that did the AK in; many people are willing to compromise on quality when buying things, if the price reflects it. And there is no limits to that, considering what crap from overseas we are buying today. Oh well....

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.


Messages In This Thread
Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-22-2022, 06:10 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Jayce - 05-22-2022, 07:29 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-22-2022, 08:45 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Jayce - 05-22-2022, 10:12 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-22-2022, 10:56 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Jayce - 05-23-2022, 11:19 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-23-2022, 09:30 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Eliot Ness - 05-24-2022, 10:04 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Chas - 05-24-2022, 10:22 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-24-2022, 11:51 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Arran - 05-25-2022, 02:27 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-25-2022, 09:57 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-28-2022, 09:15 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 05-28-2022, 10:41 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 05-28-2022, 10:53 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-29-2022, 12:09 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 05-29-2022, 12:56 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-29-2022, 03:37 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-04-2022, 08:49 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-05-2022, 12:13 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-05-2022, 12:24 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-05-2022, 01:16 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Eliot Ness - 06-05-2022, 01:43 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-05-2022, 03:17 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-05-2022, 08:58 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-06-2022, 01:25 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-06-2022, 10:06 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-06-2022, 08:25 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-06-2022, 08:26 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-06-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-06-2022, 11:37 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-06-2022, 11:46 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-09-2022, 12:29 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-09-2022, 01:32 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by rfeenstra - 06-09-2022, 06:54 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-12-2022, 10:50 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-14-2022, 10:44 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-14-2022, 11:45 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-18-2022, 10:35 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-19-2022, 06:19 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-02-2022, 07:06 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-04-2022, 12:18 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-04-2022, 02:40 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-09-2022, 02:31 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-09-2022, 03:27 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-09-2022, 05:29 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-09-2022, 06:34 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-10-2022, 01:34 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-11-2022, 09:13 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-12-2022, 10:55 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-13-2022, 10:24 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-13-2022, 11:03 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-13-2022, 12:44 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-13-2022, 03:47 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-13-2022, 09:02 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by GarySP - 07-13-2022, 09:30 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-13-2022, 09:42 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by tbone - 07-14-2022, 07:08 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by PhilcoJohn - 07-14-2022, 07:42 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-14-2022, 08:33 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Eliot Ness - 07-14-2022, 06:27 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by GarySP - 07-15-2022, 09:08 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-15-2022, 11:48 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by MrFixr55 - 07-16-2022, 11:23 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-16-2022, 12:45 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
RodB :beerchug:Vlad95 — 10:22 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Vlad, you nailed it. Swiss and German roots.RodB — 09:54 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
Well this is a Hallicrafters SX/9 circa 1936. No real issues so far although I dodged a real bullet with a cap that was...bridkarl — 07:59 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
The pinout is the same but the 5U4 has a 3 amp filament, verses 2 amps or less on the 5Z4. I think that the pinout of a ...Arran — 12:04 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
By the way. osanders0311 Take a look here: Dial cord stringing Guides May be here you can fount correct string settin...Vlad95 — 11:15 PM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
5U4 and 5Z4 almost identical. I think nothing happened if you left 5U4 instedad 5Z4 long time. Just heater current 5U4 ...Vlad95 — 11:02 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Hello Vlad95 , Very Funny ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 11:01 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
RodB You are European yourself   :evil: I'm Canadian for the last 30 years  :snowman: But not Yankee  :lol: Vlad95 — 10:49 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
The band switch selects different oscillator coils for the band selected. I would look for a bad connection in the switc...RodB — 10:31 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Hang in there...PaulPaul Philco322 — 09:30 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>