Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Atwater Kent 82, restoration.
#66

Hi Mike,

I know that you don't wanna disassemble your 82 again, but my thoughts:

Most of these early radios have rather small (8-10 uF filter caps), because I don't think that they made much bigger. By the 1940s, Filter Caps increased to 20 - 30 uF or higher., and higher still when they went to permanent magnet speakers

The RCA Manual states that the maximum input filter (between cathode and B-) for an '80 or 5Y3 is 40 uF. You state that you bridged C2 with a 20 uF Cap to no avail. That would increase the current through the field coil and may add to the hum. Try bridging the input filter cap "Filter Condenser 1" on the Rider's Diagram).

The other contributor is the '47 Output tube being directly heated (The fiament is the cathode). Try subbing (by making an adaptor) a 2A5 which was the successor to the '47. It has the same filament voltage, plate load impedance and grid bias as the 47 but has the "separate heater and cathode" design instead of the direct heated cathode. The only addition is the cathode terminal which should be grounded. If this greatly reduces hum, this will prove that the output tube is the major contributor.

The hum level is probably a lot lower than the AK36, 40, RCA Radiolas, etc. which used 71As and worse yet, 26s. 26s were the first "AC" Tubes, used in in the Radiola 17, 18, AK36, 40, etc., and were a compromise by using a heavy filament and 1.5V. They still hummed. The Philco 20 had all tubes as being true AC Tubes (24A, 27), except the 71As but these were push-pull, and the pie plate speaker had very poor frequency response due to the very hard suspension.

I think that the AK 82 had a much better suspension, similar to the Rolas of the time, and agree that very likely did not have a hum bucking coil.

I have not worked on an 82 but did restore a 165, which except for the choke / cap IF coupling to the detector, was a thoroughly modern transformer powered 2.5V version of the AA5. The field was in the B+ side of the power supply, instead of the B- leg like the 82 did, and does have the hum bucking coil. If I remember, it had a Rola speaker. It performed very well with negligible hum. However, I used a 33 uF Caps for the input filter (C13).

BTW, a lovely job on a true icon of the "cathedral" style radio!

"Do Justly, love Mercy and walk humbly with your God"- Micah 6:8
"Let us begin to do good"- St. Francis

Best Regards, 

MrFixr55


Messages In This Thread
Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-22-2022, 06:10 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Jayce - 05-22-2022, 07:29 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-22-2022, 08:45 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Jayce - 05-22-2022, 10:12 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-22-2022, 10:56 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Jayce - 05-23-2022, 11:19 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-23-2022, 09:30 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Eliot Ness - 05-24-2022, 10:04 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Chas - 05-24-2022, 10:22 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-24-2022, 11:51 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Arran - 05-25-2022, 02:27 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-25-2022, 09:57 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-28-2022, 09:15 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 05-28-2022, 10:41 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 05-28-2022, 10:53 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-29-2022, 12:09 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 05-29-2022, 12:56 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 05-29-2022, 03:37 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-04-2022, 08:49 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-05-2022, 12:13 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-05-2022, 12:24 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-05-2022, 01:16 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Eliot Ness - 06-05-2022, 01:43 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-05-2022, 03:17 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-05-2022, 08:58 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-06-2022, 01:25 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-06-2022, 10:06 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-06-2022, 08:25 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-06-2022, 08:26 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-06-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-06-2022, 11:37 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-06-2022, 11:46 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-09-2022, 12:29 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-09-2022, 01:32 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by rfeenstra - 06-09-2022, 06:54 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-12-2022, 10:50 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-14-2022, 10:44 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by radiorich - 06-14-2022, 11:45 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-18-2022, 10:35 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 06-19-2022, 06:19 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-02-2022, 07:06 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-04-2022, 12:18 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-04-2022, 02:40 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-09-2022, 02:31 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-09-2022, 03:27 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-09-2022, 05:29 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-09-2022, 06:34 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-10-2022, 01:34 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-11-2022, 09:13 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-12-2022, 10:55 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-13-2022, 10:24 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-13-2022, 11:03 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-13-2022, 12:44 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-13-2022, 03:47 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-13-2022, 09:02 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by GarySP - 07-13-2022, 09:30 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-13-2022, 09:42 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by tbone - 07-14-2022, 07:08 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by PhilcoJohn - 07-14-2022, 07:42 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by RodB - 07-14-2022, 08:33 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by Eliot Ness - 07-14-2022, 06:27 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by GarySP - 07-15-2022, 09:08 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-15-2022, 11:48 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by MrFixr55 - 07-16-2022, 11:23 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 82, restoration. - by morzh - 07-16-2022, 12:45 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
RodB :beerchug:Vlad95 — 10:22 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Vlad, you nailed it. Swiss and German roots.RodB — 09:54 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
Well this is a Hallicrafters SX/9 circa 1936. No real issues so far although I dodged a real bullet with a cap that was...bridkarl — 07:59 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
The pinout is the same but the 5U4 has a 3 amp filament, verses 2 amps or less on the 5Z4. I think that the pinout of a ...Arran — 12:04 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
By the way. osanders0311 Take a look here: Dial cord stringing Guides May be here you can fount correct string settin...Vlad95 — 11:15 PM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
5U4 and 5Z4 almost identical. I think nothing happened if you left 5U4 instedad 5Z4 long time. Just heater current 5U4 ...Vlad95 — 11:02 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Hello Vlad95 , Very Funny ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 11:01 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
RodB You are European yourself   :evil: I'm Canadian for the last 30 years  :snowman: But not Yankee  :lol: Vlad95 — 10:49 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
The band switch selects different oscillator coils for the band selected. I would look for a bad connection in the switc...RodB — 10:31 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Hang in there...PaulPaul Philco322 — 09:30 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 926 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 923 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>