Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Atwater Kent 35
#26

I wonder if the difference is due to the fact that the detector in a 37 is a 27 which has an indirectly heated cathode and much different internal structure than the 26s used in the 1st and 2nd RF as well as the 1st Audio. a 26 is essentially an 01A with a very thick 1.5V heater. the lower voltage, thoration and heavy current likely helps the filament not induce AC Hum into the set. The 26 and 27 as well as the 71A and 80 were developed for the first radios to be designed to run off AC. (RCA's eqrlier radios were DC sets that ran on AC due to the "Socket Power Unit" in the Model 104 speaker putting out 3.3V DC for the UV199s in the radio.)

I say leave the coils and swap the caps. Doesn't the 37 have "binocular" coils as opposed to the concentric ones on the 35?

BTW, Navel jelly does a good job of cleaning up the meal on the old caps, issue is that it takes off any plating that may still be there. Keep it off the insulators and the aluminum though.

"Do Justly, love Mercy and walk humbly with your God"- Micah 6:8
"Let us begin to do good"- St. Francis

Best Regards, 

MrFixr55


Messages In This Thread
Atwater Kent 35 - by 462ron - 01-19-2023, 03:46 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by mbhdesign - 01-19-2023, 10:23 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 01-20-2023, 07:19 AM
462ron - by 462ron - 01-20-2023, 10:31 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Radioroslyn - 01-20-2023, 10:36 AM
462ron - by 462ron - 01-20-2023, 11:07 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by mbhdesign - 01-20-2023, 11:21 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by mbhdesign - 01-20-2023, 11:35 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Radioroslyn - 01-20-2023, 12:01 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Radioroslyn - 01-20-2023, 01:04 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 01-22-2023, 10:52 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 01-22-2023, 11:15 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Radioroslyn - 01-22-2023, 11:40 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 01-22-2023, 11:43 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Radioroslyn - 01-23-2023, 12:23 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 01-23-2023, 06:29 AM
462ron - by 462ron - 01-23-2023, 10:29 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by radiorich - 01-23-2023, 08:15 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 01-24-2023, 04:11 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 01-24-2023, 05:08 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 01-24-2023, 05:59 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 01-24-2023, 06:22 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 01-24-2023, 06:43 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 01-24-2023, 09:50 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 01-27-2023, 02:56 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 01-27-2023, 10:31 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 01-28-2023, 10:59 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Chas - 01-28-2023, 12:45 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by vinzer - 01-28-2023, 01:00 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 01-29-2023, 01:41 AM
462ron - by 462ron - 01-29-2023, 11:48 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Ron Ramirez - 01-29-2023, 12:39 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 01-29-2023, 05:16 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 01-29-2023, 09:12 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 01-30-2023, 10:08 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Chas - 01-30-2023, 10:21 AM
462ron - by 462ron - 02-04-2023, 12:29 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 02-04-2023, 12:28 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Ron Ramirez - 02-04-2023, 04:15 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 02-04-2023, 04:27 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 02-05-2023, 09:45 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 02-05-2023, 01:50 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Chas - 02-05-2023, 06:15 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 02-06-2023, 10:38 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Chas - 02-06-2023, 11:51 AM
462ron - by 462ron - 02-06-2023, 02:20 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Chas - 02-06-2023, 03:37 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 02-06-2023, 04:38 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Chas - 02-06-2023, 06:06 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by Paul Philco322 - 02-06-2023, 09:13 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 02-06-2023, 09:28 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 02-06-2023, 09:44 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 02-06-2023, 09:44 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 02-16-2023, 04:25 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 02-19-2023, 01:22 PM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 02-19-2023, 11:25 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 02-20-2023, 09:44 AM
RE: Atwater Kent 35 - by MrFixr55 - 02-20-2023, 01:29 PM
462ron - by 462ron - 02-21-2023, 09:40 AM
462ron - by 462ron - 02-22-2023, 09:47 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
PT 6 chassis screws size???
Hello bridKarl, that sounds right or maybe 8/32 . Sincerely Richardradiorich — 01:00 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
Have this done except for missing chassis screws. It looks like 1 inch 6/32 sheet metal screw may work but can anyone s...bridkarl — 10:32 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Hello Stormlord, Well done on rewinding that coil it turned fairly good for your first one. Sincerely Richardradiorich — 09:12 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Well here it is. It ain't pretty, but hopefully it'll work. I checked it with my DMM on continuity and it keeps and r...Stormlord5500 — 08:56 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Yes, 57 is an electrolytic cap that should be 12 mfd 400 volts according to the parts list from the Phorum library schem...RodB — 06:01 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Looks like if I am reading it correctly it looks like the silver capacitor#57 that appears to be a replacement is of a l...osanders0311 — 05:09 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Thanks Arran. Yeah this plastic is pretty thin. It's a little thinner than the original stuff. It kinda reminds me of p...Stormlord5500 — 04:37 PM
Testing a speaker and output transformer Trutone A2-G
The equivalent of one short turn is basically the same as that of a shorted load. If it is the primary's turn, then the ...morzh — 03:53 PM
Testing a speaker and output transformer Trutone A2-G
I've never had an output transformer become shorted, the failure mode is usually an open primary, or in a center tapped ...Arran — 03:52 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
As long as the plastic sheeting isn't too thick, I think that the thickness of photographic film would be just about rig...Arran — 03:19 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>