Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

41-608
#14

The schematic shows a .004mfd cap (part 65) connected to a 220k resistor. Your photo shows the .003mfd cap connected to a 220K resistor. You will have to verify that the two parts physically the same by comparing the schematic to the wiring. When you replace parts that are 60 to 80 years old there is a world of unknown possibilities that can happen over that period. Including incorrect part identification like part 56 in your schematic. It looks like a 0.002mfd cap but the parts list says it's a 0.004mfd. Minor differences like this are common and what you use to replace the part is immaterial since 80 years ago the tolerance ratings for these parts was 20%. Same for the 8-12-16 electrolytics. The only one to be concerned about is the 12. It's attached to the rectifier cathode so there is a maximum value for that cap. Quite often I let my wallet tell me what value to buy, if I need a 0.004 and three 0.005 caps I'll buy ten 0.0047s because I can pay less for the ten than the four. Hope this is clear the numbers get in the way.


Messages In This Thread
41-608 - by philco4me - 01-08-2024, 08:20 PM
RE: 41-608 - by David - 01-08-2024, 09:04 PM
RE: 41-608 - by klondike98 - 01-08-2024, 09:19 PM
RE: 41-608 - by Radioroslyn - 01-08-2024, 09:21 PM
RE: 41-608 - by RodB - 01-08-2024, 09:36 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-09-2024, 09:27 AM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-11-2024, 03:31 PM
RE: 41-608 - by RodB - 01-11-2024, 03:49 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-12-2024, 02:50 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-13-2024, 01:52 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-13-2024, 02:01 PM
RE: 41-608 - by klondike98 - 01-14-2024, 02:20 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-22-2024, 01:22 PM
RE: 41-608 - by RodB - 01-22-2024, 02:20 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-22-2024, 03:22 PM
RE: 41-608 - by radiorich - 01-23-2024, 12:04 AM
RE: 41-608 - by RodB - 01-23-2024, 10:44 AM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-23-2024, 08:45 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-24-2024, 11:43 AM
RE: 41-608 - by RodB - 01-24-2024, 06:19 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-24-2024, 07:17 PM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-29-2024, 11:05 PM
RE: 41-608 - by radiorich - 01-30-2024, 10:04 AM
RE: 41-608 - by philco4me - 01-30-2024, 11:52 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
RodB :beerchug:Vlad95 — 10:22 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Vlad, you nailed it. Swiss and German roots.RodB — 09:54 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
Well this is a Hallicrafters SX/9 circa 1936. No real issues so far although I dodged a real bullet with a cap that was...bridkarl — 07:59 AM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
The pinout is the same but the 5U4 has a 3 amp filament, verses 2 amps or less on the 5Z4. I think that the pinout of a ...Arran — 12:04 AM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
By the way. osanders0311 Take a look here: Dial cord stringing Guides May be here you can fount correct string settin...Vlad95 — 11:15 PM
5U4 vs 5Z4 tubes
5U4 and 5Z4 almost identical. I think nothing happened if you left 5U4 instedad 5Z4 long time. Just heater current 5U4 ...Vlad95 — 11:02 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Hello Vlad95 , Very Funny ! Sincerely Richardradiorich — 11:01 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
RodB You are European yourself   :evil: I'm Canadian for the last 30 years  :snowman: But not Yankee  :lol: Vlad95 — 10:49 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
The band switch selects different oscillator coils for the band selected. I would look for a bad connection in the switc...RodB — 10:31 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Hang in there...PaulPaul Philco322 — 09:30 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 925 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 922 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>