Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K
#10

Breaking the eye tube socket isn't really a concern unless the set has one of those awful Eby eye tube sockets with the solid Bakelite back. Most of the decent ones with a metal cover were made by Amphenol, opening those isn't too hard but you need a sharp flat bladed screwdriver to wedge into the slots on the cover, it's hard to break one unless you use excessive force. Most of the time when I need to open one up it's because the cable is shot and the wires need to be replaced. Some companies, like Sparton, had enough sense to install the 1 meg ohm resistor under the chassis rather then in the socket itself, the reason they burn out is because they used a 1/4 watt resistor where they should have used a 1/2 watt.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Jayce - 03-13-2013, 04:19 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by y2kbruce - 03-13-2013, 04:47 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Jayce - 03-13-2013, 05:04 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Arran - 03-13-2013, 07:37 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Jayce - 03-13-2013, 10:55 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by morzh - 03-13-2013, 11:36 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by OldJack1969 - 10-10-2014, 07:04 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by jontz - 03-14-2013, 07:14 AM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by morzh - 03-14-2013, 06:08 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by jontz - 03-14-2013, 09:28 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Arran - 03-14-2013, 09:41 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by morzh - 03-14-2013, 09:51 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Jayce - 03-14-2013, 10:58 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by morzh - 03-15-2013, 10:20 AM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by TA Forbes - 03-15-2013, 07:24 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by morzh - 10-10-2014, 09:27 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by thirtiesradio - 12-12-2014, 04:49 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Arran - 12-13-2014, 02:10 AM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by Phlogiston - 12-13-2014, 09:07 PM
RE: Philco 38-116X vs RCA 15K - by thirtiesradio - 12-14-2014, 02:26 AM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Thank you sir. Yes I feel good and also relieved because this one's been weighing on me a bit.Stormlord5500 — 11:18 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
It feels good don't it? Good luck on the rest.Paul Philco322 — 11:06 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I've reinstalled the coil. Now IT'S ALIVE!!!!!! I fired up my TinySA on signal generator mode and set it to 1400Kc and ...Stormlord5500 — 11:01 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Yes, Walmart, right up there with Fluke.RodB — 11:00 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
it certainly won't be metric! SAE threads were all that was known then. Take care, - GaryGarySP — 10:58 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I think this thing is way more accurate than my Walmart DMM. :DStormlord5500 — 08:19 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Thankyou for the kind words sir. I double checked it with my component tester and it read 2.7 ohms at .02mH.Stormlord5500 — 08:14 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
Hello bridKarl, that sounds right or maybe 8/32 . Sincerely Richardradiorich — 01:00 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
Have this done except for missing chassis screws. It looks like 1 inch 6/32 sheet metal screw may work but can anyone s...bridkarl — 10:32 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Hello Stormlord, Well done on rewinding that coil it turned fairly good for your first one. Sincerely Richardradiorich — 09:12 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>