Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Model 89 bakelite block clarification
#1

Since my model 89 has the K-21 speaker, but still has the #36 tube, I've determined my set is somewhere between schematics #6, #7, and #8 in the http://www.philcoradio.com/tech/89evol.htm section. My question concerns the change made between November 15, 1933: Code 123, Run 7 and December 1, 1933: Code 123, Run 9 :

"Condenser 3615-L, .05 uF, formerly in parallel with .09 uF section of condenser ( 8 ), removed. Condenser (5), 4989-AG (.09 uF with 300 ohm resistor) removed. Above three parts replaced by condenser 4989-H (twin .09 uF) and flexible resistor 33-3010 (300 ohms) added from cathode of RF socket and ground."

My # 44 RF tube has what looks like a little cloth covered worm between the cathode to ground. I'm assuming that is the flexible resistor 33-3010 (300 ohms) mentioned above? Mine reads open so I can't verify the value.

Code 123, Run 7 looks like this:
   

And Code 123, Run 9 looks like this:
   

For the bakelite block shown as #5 in Run 7, and as 5 and 5a in Run 9, if I'm reading that right, having that little cloth covered flexible resistor replaces having a 300 ohm resistor and the .09 mfd capacitor inside the bakelite block? In other words, should there just be a .09 mfd cap in the block, and that separate 300 ohm resistor outside the block, mounted from the cathode of the #44 tube to ground?

My theory for this is the separate designation on the bakelite block on Run 7 of the . 09 mfd cap & 300 ohm resistor as being just #5, and on Run 9 it became #5 for the cap, and #5a for the resistor.

Any thoughts, ideas, whacks along side the head would be most helpful Icon_smile

Greg V.
West Bend, WI
Member WARCI.org


Messages In This Thread
Model 89 bakelite block clarification - by NostalgiaRadioTime - 02-16-2014, 02:10 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
So one last question before I finish this radio. Regarding the speaker and output transformer. I salvaged the original o...Stormlord5500 — 09:31 AM
462ron
It’s on the bottom of the homepage of our Philcoradio.com homepage! Ron462ron — 07:20 AM
Model 70 Cabinet Trim
Steve might have some trim left. Not sure he is making anything.morzh — 06:12 AM
Model 70 Cabinet Trim
Hello musar, First all welcome to the forum and yes that is true that steve stopped making trim . Sincerely Richar...radiorich — 12:13 AM
Model 70 Cabinet Trim
I have recently come into possession of a Model 70.  The trim around the base needs to be replaced.  If this were years ...musar — 12:07 AM
philcorepairbench.com - shadow-meter
Anyone know of a way to recover these files from the repair bench? Thanks. fenbach — 11:16 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
That's true. Of course If I were to get a vtvm I'd probably have to sink money in to it to get it working right. Probabl...Stormlord5500 — 08:44 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
A DMM is good enough. One rarely has to measure indictance, but if you do, short of getting a serious LCR meter (I hav...morzh — 07:35 PM
Testing a speaker and output transformer Trutone A2-G
You guy's are right on. I found a broken wire on the speaker plug that I replaced and all is well now. Have better volu...murf — 03:43 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I need to get a vtvm. I think that little component tester is just more accurate. Plus it shows the inductance which is ...Stormlord5500 — 03:07 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 571 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 568 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>