Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262
#63

(01-03-2015, 08:49 PM)Ron Ramirez Wrote:  It's funny...the 6T5 was the only bad tube. The rest are all good. Yes, most are metal; pardon me. I do not have a lot of ST style octal tubes and of the ones I do have, I'm saving them for use in my 1937-38 Philcos. Pin 1 of each socket is connected to chassis ground (I checked). So even though it doesn't look pretty by Brand Z standards, it is functional.

 Ron;
  I likely would have done the same, by the fact that Brand Z decided to ground pin #1 on each socket implies that, unlike Philco, they really had no objection to the idea of metal tubes being used as replacements in their sets. You could also have used GT style tubes if you really had to have glass, I can't recall whether this set still had the tube shields with it or not but by the looks of those clips you could use pretty much any style of octal tube you had on hand provided that the grid lead was long enough.
Regards
Arran


Messages In This Thread
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-22-2014, 03:36 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by murf - 12-24-2014, 12:16 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-22-2014, 03:59 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-22-2014, 04:04 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-22-2014, 09:38 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 12-23-2014, 01:04 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-23-2014, 06:22 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-23-2014, 06:32 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 12-24-2014, 05:27 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-24-2014, 11:25 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-24-2014, 06:12 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-24-2014, 11:21 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 12:16 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-25-2014, 12:39 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 12:21 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 06:03 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 12-25-2014, 01:59 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 02:57 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 03:18 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 12-26-2014, 12:00 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 03:16 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-28-2014, 10:14 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-01-2015, 11:07 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-30-2014, 06:34 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 12-31-2014, 04:03 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-01-2015, 02:43 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by murf - 01-01-2015, 09:10 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-04-2015, 02:19 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-03-2015, 10:22 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-03-2015, 10:45 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-04-2015, 01:06 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-04-2015, 03:50 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-04-2015, 08:16 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by GarySP - 01-04-2015, 10:37 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-05-2015, 02:51 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 01-05-2015, 11:41 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-06-2015, 12:25 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-06-2015, 09:56 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 01-07-2015, 08:29 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-08-2015, 12:40 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-08-2015, 01:52 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-08-2015, 02:03 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-08-2015, 03:30 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-09-2015, 11:07 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-08-2015, 11:31 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-09-2015, 05:10 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 01-10-2015, 03:21 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-10-2015, 03:17 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 01-10-2015, 07:10 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-10-2015, 10:52 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-15-2015, 10:28 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-16-2015, 02:34 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 02:07 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-19-2015, 12:29 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-16-2015, 09:46 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-17-2015, 02:07 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-17-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 01:53 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 12:35 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I think this thing is way more accurate than my Walmart DMM. :DStormlord5500 — 08:19 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Thankyou for the kind words sir. I double checked it with my component tester and it read 2.7 ohms at .02mH.Stormlord5500 — 08:14 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
Hello bridKarl, that sounds right or maybe 8/32 . Sincerely Richardradiorich — 01:00 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
Have this done except for missing chassis screws. It looks like 1 inch 6/32 sheet metal screw may work but can anyone s...bridkarl — 10:32 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Hello Stormlord, Well done on rewinding that coil it turned fairly good for your first one. Sincerely Richardradiorich — 09:12 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Well here it is. It ain't pretty, but hopefully it'll work. I checked it with my DMM on continuity and it keeps and r...Stormlord5500 — 08:56 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Yes, 57 is an electrolytic cap that should be 12 mfd 400 volts according to the parts list from the Phorum library schem...RodB — 06:01 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Looks like if I am reading it correctly it looks like the silver capacitor#57 that appears to be a replacement is of a l...osanders0311 — 05:09 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Thanks Arran. Yeah this plastic is pretty thin. It's a little thinner than the original stuff. It kinda reminds me of p...Stormlord5500 — 04:37 PM
Testing a speaker and output transformer Trutone A2-G
The equivalent of one short turn is basically the same as that of a shorted load. If it is the primary's turn, then the ...morzh — 03:53 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 752 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 751 Guest(s)
Avatar

>