Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262
#67

Okay,

I must not be experiencing the same noise you are, Mike. As I mentioned, I have to help tune the Zenith up the scale with my finger pushing the upper pulley along due to the bad drive belt. Tuning down is OK. But there is no more noise in this Brand Z set than there is in any of my Philcos.

In fact, I have to say that this 9-S-262 does sound good. I just gave it a complete alignment. Everything (with the exception of the drive belts) is A-O-K. I can see why so many people like this model. But while it is impressive, it isn't enough to make me switch from Philco. Icon_wink Icon_biggrin

All that remains is for me to replace the dial belts (once they arrive) and to replace those AM leaves in the shutter dial mechanism. I may attempt that tomorrow.

I hope the belts get here soon, and that I have no problems with replacing the leaves - I'm anxious to get started on my Philco Tropic 42-788. Icon_smile

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-22-2014, 03:36 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by murf - 12-24-2014, 12:16 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-22-2014, 03:59 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-22-2014, 04:04 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-22-2014, 09:38 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 12-23-2014, 01:04 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-23-2014, 06:22 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-23-2014, 06:32 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 12-24-2014, 05:27 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-24-2014, 11:25 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-24-2014, 06:12 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-24-2014, 11:21 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 12:16 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-25-2014, 12:39 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 12:21 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 06:03 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 12-25-2014, 01:59 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 02:57 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 03:18 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 12-26-2014, 12:00 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 03:16 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-28-2014, 10:14 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-01-2015, 11:07 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-30-2014, 06:34 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 12-31-2014, 04:03 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-01-2015, 02:43 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by murf - 01-01-2015, 09:10 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-04-2015, 02:19 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-03-2015, 10:22 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-03-2015, 10:45 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-04-2015, 01:06 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-04-2015, 03:50 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Ron Ramirez - 01-04-2015, 04:46 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-04-2015, 08:16 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by GarySP - 01-04-2015, 10:37 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-05-2015, 02:51 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 01-05-2015, 11:41 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-06-2015, 12:25 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-06-2015, 09:56 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 01-07-2015, 08:29 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-08-2015, 12:40 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-08-2015, 01:52 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-08-2015, 02:03 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-08-2015, 03:30 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-09-2015, 11:07 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-08-2015, 11:31 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-09-2015, 05:10 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 01-10-2015, 03:21 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-10-2015, 03:17 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 01-10-2015, 07:10 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-10-2015, 10:52 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-15-2015, 10:28 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-16-2015, 02:34 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 02:07 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-19-2015, 12:29 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-16-2015, 09:46 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-17-2015, 02:07 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-17-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 01:53 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 12:35 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I think this thing is way more accurate than my Walmart DMM. :DStormlord5500 — 08:19 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Thankyou for the kind words sir. I double checked it with my component tester and it read 2.7 ohms at .02mH.Stormlord5500 — 08:14 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
Hello bridKarl, that sounds right or maybe 8/32 . Sincerely Richardradiorich — 01:00 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
Have this done except for missing chassis screws. It looks like 1 inch 6/32 sheet metal screw may work but can anyone s...bridkarl — 10:32 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Hello Stormlord, Well done on rewinding that coil it turned fairly good for your first one. Sincerely Richardradiorich — 09:12 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Well here it is. It ain't pretty, but hopefully it'll work. I checked it with my DMM on continuity and it keeps and r...Stormlord5500 — 08:56 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Yes, 57 is an electrolytic cap that should be 12 mfd 400 volts according to the parts list from the Phorum library schem...RodB — 06:01 PM
Philco 42-345 Restoration/Repair
Looks like if I am reading it correctly it looks like the silver capacitor#57 that appears to be a replacement is of a l...osanders0311 — 05:09 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Thanks Arran. Yeah this plastic is pretty thin. It's a little thinner than the original stuff. It kinda reminds me of p...Stormlord5500 — 04:37 PM
Testing a speaker and output transformer Trutone A2-G
The equivalent of one short turn is basically the same as that of a shorted load. If it is the primary's turn, then the ...morzh — 03:53 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 741 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 740 Guest(s)
Avatar

>