Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

GE 443 AA5
#1

I found this radio on Ebay.  It is the same model my mother listened to every day while working in the kitchen.  I fell asleep to it listening to WLS in my early teens.  Certainly not a great radio but I have it working for nostalgia reasons.

Question for the experts among us on IF transformers with silver mica disease:  I cut out the silver mica caps and installed new mica caps and the radio works.  I was able to tune the transformers for the 455khz IF.  However, I did not have the exact caps.  Instead of 110 mmf, I used 100mmf, and on the second IF, instead of the 75 mmf, I used 70 mmf.  As I said, I was able to peak the IF at 455.  The question is, does the efficiency of the IF transformer suffer by reducing the capacitance of the LC circuit and increasing the inductance?  The radio works ok, but is not as sensitive as I think it should be.  (I have to say, though, I did not test the tubes., and I have no experience with AA5's.)

Just as an aside, I was pleased to see that this design isolated the chassis from line voltage.
#2

Back in the day caps could be plus minus 20% ecaps plus minus 50%.
#3

Could you tack in some small values, or even add "Gimmicks" outside the cans to test whether it makes a difference? Just a thought.

I suppose the real question is whether the change affects the coupling in each transformer by a significant amount. Also not to be forgotten is that the transformer resonance is also affected by the type of circuit and wiring layout, so the real value of capacitances across each coil are never exactly the book value. 5 - 10 pf is pretty easy to gain or loose.

Cheers

Ed

I don't hold with furniture that talks.
#4

Thanks guys. I was indeed thinking of tacking a few 5mmf caps across the pins of the IF to see if it made any difference. thought I'd ask before I went through the trouble.




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
So one last question before I finish this radio. Regarding the speaker and output transformer. I salvaged the original o...Stormlord5500 — 09:31 AM
462ron
It’s on the bottom of the homepage of our Philcoradio.com homepage! Ron462ron — 07:20 AM
Model 70 Cabinet Trim
Steve might have some trim left. Not sure he is making anything.morzh — 06:12 AM
Model 70 Cabinet Trim
Hello musar, First all welcome to the forum and yes that is true that steve stopped making trim . Sincerely Richar...radiorich — 12:13 AM
Model 70 Cabinet Trim
I have recently come into possession of a Model 70.  The trim around the base needs to be replaced.  If this were years ...musar — 12:07 AM
philcorepairbench.com - shadow-meter
Anyone know of a way to recover these files from the repair bench? Thanks. fenbach — 11:16 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
That's true. Of course If I were to get a vtvm I'd probably have to sink money in to it to get it working right. Probabl...Stormlord5500 — 08:44 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
A DMM is good enough. One rarely has to measure indictance, but if you do, short of getting a serious LCR meter (I hav...morzh — 07:35 PM
Testing a speaker and output transformer Trutone A2-G
You guy's are right on. I found a broken wire on the speaker plug that I replaced and all is well now. Have better volu...murf — 03:43 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I need to get a vtvm. I think that little component tester is just more accurate. Plus it shows the inductance which is ...Stormlord5500 — 03:07 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 788 online users. [Complete List]
» 1 Member(s) | 787 Guest(s)
Avatar

>