Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

How much Oscilloscope is enough?
#1

I was looking at some PC based 'scopes. I have this huge Sencore SC61 unit that weighs at least 25 - 30 pounds, 60 MHZ usable to 100 MHZ. I'd like to sell it because I don't think I need to go that high doing tube radio repair/ restoration, and frankly, I don't have the room to use it. Would 20 MHZ be adequate? Hantek makes a PC based 20 MHZ unit for $69 and a 50 MHZ unit for $149. Any thoughts? Thanks! Joe

Joe

Matthew 16:26 "For what does it profit a man if he gain the whole world, yet lose his own soul?"
#2

For AM raio it is enough, for FM you need more.
I rarely use scope on radios....maybe for output. Or to check oscillatiors.
#3

Do you do any electronic repair other than old AM tube gear?

What have you used your scope for in the last XX years?  A good chance the upper frequency response will not change.

All the PC base stuff is getting better and cheaper.

There also older compact scopes that show up now & then.

Scopes are one of those things you don't need till you need.

Rule 1 if you are selling you get almost nothing.
Rule 2 if you need one they are all $$

PC base makes capturing nifty pictures easy from what I  can tell.  I still have to try using a digital camera capture a trace.

Good probes can be as expensive as used scopes.  Again it depends on band width.  Probably want to keep your probes.
#4

(09-14-2014, 04:21 PM)Joe Rossi Wrote:  I was looking at some PC based 'scopes.  I have this huge Sencore SC61 unit that weighs at least 25 - 30 pounds, 60 MHZ usable to 100 MHZ.  I'd like to sell it because I don't think I need to go that high doing tube radio repair/ restoration, and frankly, I don't have the room to use it.  Would 20 MHZ be adequate?  Hantek makes a PC based 20 MHZ unit for $69 and a 50 MHZ unit for $149.  Any thoughts?  Thanks!  Joe

I briefly used the 20 MHz version with signals in the 1-2 MHz range. The display looked kind of rough and coarse. So if it was me, I'd spend the extra on the 50 MHz unit. Other than that it worked well, and I think they are adequate for occasional use.  




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
1949 Motorola 5A9M
That's got to be one of the tightest conglomeration of components I've ever seen! I wonder how the line workers felt bu...GarySP — 05:46 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Bob; I think that the Phillips was actually manufactured in Canada, though they may have imported many of the compone...Arran — 02:28 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
I've started replacing the electrolytic caps now. As Arran mentioned, they are housed under a metal strap. Here's a ph...klondike98 — 12:22 PM
1949 Motorola 5A9M
Thank for that info Arran! Very interesting. Phillips and Motorola must have made some type of marketing deal back then....klondike98 — 11:49 AM
46-1213 Schematic Question
Good idea on the fuse. These old transformers need extra protection.RodB — 10:02 AM
46-1213 Schematic Question
Hello Larry, Well, anyway I can contest about noisey grounds in my living room when I am using one outlet in my house a...radiorich — 08:03 AM
46-1213 Schematic Question
RodB & MrFixr55, Thank you both for the great replies at my questions, I appreciate the help very much.  As suggest...MissouriLarry — 07:04 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad; I also have an R-646 but it's in rough shape, the chassis is complete, but the speaker is missing, and the cabin...Arran — 01:06 AM
46-1213 Schematic Question
Hi Larry, Back when this set was built, they did not use polarized power plugs. Technically, your chassis is sittin...MrFixr55 — 12:11 AM
Rogers Majestic R-646
Vlad, rather cool radio and for $18, I would have driven much more than 16t minutes or miles.! It does appear to be a T...MrFixr55 — 11:52 PM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>