Welcome Guest! Be sure you know and follow the Phorum Rules before posting. Thank you and Enjoy! (January 12) x

Thread Closed
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Another Philco Radio Question
#1

Guys I have to ask, I am able to purchase a Philco 37-650 console. I would love to hear everyones thoughts to weather it would be a radio to purchase or one to pass up on. The cabinet on the radio is in great shape. It is only missing one knob, the grill cloth is ok just a little stain on it. Let me know what you guys think, Thanks John
#2

They are pretty nice radios and perform very well. But, as with all 1937 Philcos, watch out for the infamous Unit Construction and the possibility of one or more coils being bad.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN
#3

Ron as you stated why do the coils end up being bad on the 1937 Philcos? Were they made badly or something?
#4

I understand that Philco used a sealing wax that had a high sulphur content and over the years/decades, moisture incursion along with the sulphur compounds creates weak sulphuric acid and that eats up copper very nicely. The "Greenies" is the blue-green copper sulphate leftover.

This is not an indictment of Philco. These sets were not expected to last 60-70 yrs after they left the factory.

Chuck
#5

The other theory I heard of was that some used a strip of celluloid plastic, with a high nitric acid content, and that damaged the coils, at least in the RF coils in the model 90s.
Regards
Arran
#6

That's what I haqve always heard about the Philco coils - the nitric acid in the celluloid damages the coils. It's usually the primaries (outer windings) that suffer the damage, but in advanced cases the inner (secondary) windings can also get the "greenies" as well.

Sulphur in the wax makes sense also. And a combination of these plus moisture equals trouble at some point for the coils.

As Chuck said, these radios were not intended to last 3/4 of a century or more. That many have is a testament to how well products were once made. To say more would mean going political, so let's leave it at that.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
A DMM is good enough. One rarely has to measure indictance, but if you do, short of getting a serious LCR meter (I hav...morzh — 07:35 PM
Testing a speaker and output transformer Trutone A2-G
You guy's are right on. I found a broken wire on the speaker plug that I replaced and all is well now. Have better volu...murf — 03:43 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I need to get a vtvm. I think that little component tester is just more accurate. Plus it shows the inductance which is ...Stormlord5500 — 03:07 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I use a pair of Mastercraft brand DMMs from Canadian Tire, from what I read most of those DMMs use the same main chip re...Arran — 02:36 PM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Thank you sir. Yes I feel good and also relieved because this one's been weighing on me a bit.Stormlord5500 — 11:18 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
It feels good don't it? Good luck on the rest.Paul Philco322 — 11:06 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I've reinstalled the coil. Now IT'S ALIVE!!!!!! I fired up my TinySA on signal generator mode and set it to 1400Kc and ...Stormlord5500 — 11:01 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
Yes, Walmart, right up there with Fluke.RodB — 11:00 AM
PT 6 chassis screws size???
it certainly won't be metric! SAE threads were all that was known then. Take care, - GaryGarySP — 10:58 AM
Philco model 38 code 121 not receiving signal.
I think this thing is way more accurate than my Walmart DMM. :DStormlord5500 — 08:19 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 1456 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 1453 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>