Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 95 value
#1

Picked up a Philco 95 today.
Had been in the family since new.
Cabinet in exc. condition. No Loose veneer .
Appears that it has had some areas re-finished at some time.
Guy said it worked fine.
Brought it home and hooked it up to variac, and it play beautifully. No hum or static.
Receives signals strong through the whole dial.
Looks like original rayon covered cord to boot.
Bought this to re-sell.
Do not plan on removing the chassis.
Will just clean it up and sell.
What you Philco fans price this one at?

[Image: http://i1161.photobucket.com/albums/q509...2095-1.jpg][Image: http://i1161.photobucket.com/albums/q509...2095-2.jpg][Image: http://i1161.photobucket.com/albums/q509...2095-3.jpg]
#2

$85-120 where I am.

People who do not drink, do not smoke, do not eat red meat will one day feel really stupid lying there and dying from nothing.
#3

 Something doesn't look right about the finish on the cabinet, for one thing it looks sort of dull, and it should be gloss. For another it doesn't look like there is any toner on the solid wood parts, like the legs, the moldings, and the edges of the cabinet doors. On my model 96 lowboy it also had this fogging effect around the edges of the front panels, and the sides of the cabinet were finished with a dark walnut lacquer. I think that someone stripped your cabinet at some point and refinished it. It's unfortunate that the photo of the model 95 highboy is of such a poor example in terms of getting the shading effect, it looks dirty or like someone smeared oil stain all over it.
Regards
Arran
#4

Yeah. Here is an original finish from a CL ad. You can see, though yellowed, the trim and legs are darker.

   

Now the same radio refinished:

   

Well after looking at his again, I suppose they could have used less toner on the top. Or maybe just the top was refinished. The legs look about right. But the white wood trim to the left and right should have been toned darker on top and bottom leaving a lighter area in the center (vertically).

That is the original finish on the bird's eye front and the inside of the doors. So I matched that level of gloss in the refinish of the rest. It probably had more gloss when new.

I think I gave $90 for this one, which was probably $40 too much as it was in the CL ad.

"I just might turn into smoke, but I feel fine"
http://www.russoldradios.com/




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 39-116 radio and remote
Hi Brad, Thanks so much for the info!  Do you happen to have the specs for the PT-86 transformer?  I did not find a lis...RichG — 04:32 PM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Thanks Arran; If your set has five tubes/valves then it could be an A537, V537, or a U527, then again it looks like s...ChasL0001 — 11:07 AM
Philco 29 or 45
29 chassis has a shadow meter while 45 chassis does not. Shadow meter is part no. 27 in the 29 schematic. compare it t...klondike98 — 10:32 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Sorry, Chas. Re the burns, I broke my first TV at the age of 3.  Between my electrical experiments :yikes: (My mom wa...MrFixr55 — 09:07 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Thanks for the compliment Richard. The tenite grille is original. A few of the horizontal slats were slightly warped so ...RodB — 08:44 AM
Philco 29 or 45
Hello, I have just received a Philco lowboy where the tube layout label in the cabinet says 29 or 45. There is no label ...dconant — 08:29 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Mr fixr, That is great news I would love to see repo grille !! I too have a very similar Philco but my cabinet has fab...radiorich — 08:22 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Hi Rod, I always tell people that my scars give me character.  :wink:   Great job on the radio.  Is the grille origi...MrFixr55 — 08:00 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
It looks like the PENDD61 valve/tube must have failed, so someone replaced it with the EBC33, which is a double diode-tr...Arran — 04:29 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Hello Chas. Radiomuseum has information on both sets.  Thanks Gary, lots of good info there. Perhaps we'll ha...ChasL0001 — 02:23 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2759 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 2756 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>