Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Equivalent circuit for a split 2Meg pot
#1

I'm restoring a 38-7, and the original 2Mohm volume control/loudness circuit  was replaced by a very cheap non-split pot that is falling apart. I'm embarrassed to be asking this, but I came across a thread somewhere in this forum about an equivalent circuit for the loudness control that could be constructed using two 1 Meg pots.  I've got the pots now, but of course in the meantime I can't find that link.  Can anyone direct me to the thread that showed a simple circuit for the loudness/volume control that was made from 2 coupled 1M pots? 

I'll post an update on how well it works if I can find it again.
Thanks!!
#2

Don't know how that could work but I take it that you have a dual 1m pot on hand? If so it's important to determine the taper (needs to be audio taper). If you don't have one I'd get Mark Opatt a call more than likely he can fix you up with the proper control.

GL

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#3

Audio taper!  Bummer, I got a pair of linears.  I am doing this project to learn about tube radios, and the most effective way to learn is to make mistakes, so I'm learning a lot.  I will get in touch with Mark.

In the meantime I went back and looked at my history to find the circuit.  It was described in the UK Vintage Radio site.  The link to the circuit is  here.  The circuit uses two coupled 1M pots, and provides a pretty nice Bass boost at low volume. And, of course, it uses log pots.  I'll pursue this and let you know how the 38-7 likes it.

https://www.vintage-radio.net/forum/show...p?t=126515

Clif
#4

i stole this quote from ARF , in someones sig if it helps you at all.

“Experience is what you gain when the results aren't what you were expecting”




Users browsing this thread:
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 39-116 radio and remote
Hi Brad, Thanks so much for the info!  Do you happen to have the specs for the PT-86 transformer?  I did not find a lis...RichG — 04:32 PM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Thanks Arran; If your set has five tubes/valves then it could be an A537, V537, or a U527, then again it looks like s...ChasL0001 — 11:07 AM
Philco 29 or 45
29 chassis has a shadow meter while 45 chassis does not. Shadow meter is part no. 27 in the 29 schematic. compare it t...klondike98 — 10:32 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Sorry, Chas. Re the burns, I broke my first TV at the age of 3.  Between my electrical experiments :yikes: (My mom wa...MrFixr55 — 09:07 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Thanks for the compliment Richard. The tenite grille is original. A few of the horizontal slats were slightly warped so ...RodB — 08:44 AM
Philco 29 or 45
Hello, I have just received a Philco lowboy where the tube layout label in the cabinet says 29 or 45. There is no label ...dconant — 08:29 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Mr fixr, That is great news I would love to see repo grille !! I too have a very similar Philco but my cabinet has fab...radiorich — 08:22 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Hi Rod, I always tell people that my scars give me character.  :wink:   Great job on the radio.  Is the grille origi...MrFixr55 — 08:00 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
It looks like the PENDD61 valve/tube must have failed, so someone replaced it with the EBC33, which is a double diode-tr...Arran — 04:29 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Hello Chas. Radiomuseum has information on both sets.  Thanks Gary, lots of good info there. Perhaps we'll ha...ChasL0001 — 02:23 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently 2377 online users. [Complete List]
» 3 Member(s) | 2374 Guest(s)
AvatarAvatarAvatar

>