Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

model 84b
#16

>are you running a polarized plug ensuring the hot is switched?
No, You can if you like not a big deal. I don't particularity like them as they don't fit into some receptacles.

> but it seems that 10mfd  50vcap from the ct to ground (28) wouldn't be too happy if you didn't,especially as the chassis must be grounded.
Well the 10 mfd doesn't care at all about the mains polarization as it is isolated thru the power transformer. It's strictly there to filter the negative dc voltage. The other part of 28 (.015) on the primary of the transformer gives the chassis a rf ground thru the neutral side of the mains. It's better to connect an earth ground (one not related to the mains ground or neutral) as the mains can carry a lot of noise.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry
#17

perhaps i misunderstood,im still not used to the idea of philcos attempts at the worlds first IC! i was on the wrong side of the transformer! forgive my ignorance! by the way what are your thoughts on coating the transformer coils with polyurethane? mine all read good.
#18

>forgive my ignorance!
No problem! I find myself on the wrong side of a transformer every once and a while too!

>your thoughts on coating the transformer coils with polyurethane? 
Not sure what effects it may have on the efficiency (known as Q of a coil). By lowering the Q it can foul things up, Oscillators won't oscillate, poor sensitivity, and poor selectivity.
I would stick with wax, nothing, or just a bit of lacquer. I'm thinking that getting rid of the original plastic strip is a big help to alleviate the rot problem.

When my pals were reading comic books
I was down in the basement in my dad's
workshop. Perusing his Sam's Photofoacts
Vol 1-50 admiring the old set and trying to
figure out what all those squiggly meant.
Circa 1966
Now I think I've got!

Terry




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
[-]
Recent Posts
Philco 39-116 radio and remote
Hi Brad, Thanks so much for the info!  Do you happen to have the specs for the PT-86 transformer?  I did not find a lis...RichG — 04:32 PM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Thanks Arran; If your set has five tubes/valves then it could be an A537, V537, or a U527, then again it looks like s...ChasL0001 — 11:07 AM
Philco 29 or 45
29 chassis has a shadow meter while 45 chassis does not. Shadow meter is part no. 27 in the 29 schematic. compare it t...klondike98 — 10:32 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Sorry, Chas. Re the burns, I broke my first TV at the age of 3.  Between my electrical experiments :yikes: (My mom wa...MrFixr55 — 09:07 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Thanks for the compliment Richard. The tenite grille is original. A few of the horizontal slats were slightly warped so ...RodB — 08:44 AM
Philco 29 or 45
Hello, I have just received a Philco lowboy where the tube layout label in the cabinet says 29 or 45. There is no label ...dconant — 08:29 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Mr fixr, That is great news I would love to see repo grille !! I too have a very similar Philco but my cabinet has fab...radiorich — 08:22 AM
Philco 41-221 Restored
Hi Rod, I always tell people that my scars give me character.  :wink:   Great job on the radio.  Is the grille origi...MrFixr55 — 08:00 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
It looks like the PENDD61 valve/tube must have failed, so someone replaced it with the EBC33, which is a double diode-tr...Arran — 04:29 AM
Philco 269 - 444 FIVE VALVE VERSION?
Hello Chas. Radiomuseum has information on both sets.  Thanks Gary, lots of good info there. Perhaps we'll ha...ChasL0001 — 02:23 AM

[-]
Who's Online
There are currently no members online.

>