Posts: 162
Threads: 37
Joined: Oct 2012
City: St Louis MO USA
So I need your opinion on which one should I keep. Both have 7591 output tubes but the Fisher I believe has a built in multiplex, correct me if I'm wrong. I will provide pictures soon, having some issues with photobucket.
Posts: 162
Threads: 37
Joined: Oct 2012
City: St Louis MO USA
Posts: 162
Threads: 37
Joined: Oct 2012
City: St Louis MO USA
And pictures of the Eico that i have already finished the rebuild, and it sounds fantastic. So someone tell me will the Fisher perform better.
[Image: http://i1281.photobucket.com/albums/a508...lhiqjb.jpg]
[Image: http://i1281.photobucket.com/albums/a508...sqaybd.jpg]
Posts: 344
Threads: 38
Joined: Jun 2011
City: Tustin
State, Province, Country: California
I've had both and I'd keep the Fisher. No multiplex in the Fisher as a MPX is used in a tuner or receiver. The X-101-D does have a strange bias set up but it's a great sounding amplifier.
Posts: 2,128
Threads: 18
Joined: Oct 2008
City: Merrick, Long Island, NY
You'd probably get more $ for the Fisher (if both restored,) but probably not a whole lot of difference otherwise.
Posts: 162
Threads: 37
Joined: Oct 2012
City: St Louis MO USA
Well i tried to sell the Fisher and no takers, so i'm keeping it and selling the Eico. The Eico is restored and the Fisher is not but i will remedy that real soon. Thanks everyone for the input and suggestions.