Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Philco 42-355
#21

Jerry is correct on both counts - in that your 42-355 never had a back, and that the "mystery" wire is part of the FM dipole. Icon_thumbup

I would not remove the white or black wires, but leave them in place. Notice how the two wires terminate in a plug which plugs into the back of the chassis?

There are ways to make that old 42-50 mc FM band useful:

http://www.somerset.net/arm/fm_only.html

I should add that I have never tried any of those converters, but I'll have to do so sometime.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-04-2012, 02:28 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-04-2012, 03:52 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-04-2012, 03:57 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-04-2012, 04:00 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-04-2012, 04:24 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by jerryhawthorne - 12-04-2012, 07:17 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-04-2012, 07:33 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by jerryhawthorne - 12-04-2012, 09:12 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-05-2012, 11:55 AM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by DeckApe - 12-05-2012, 01:14 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-05-2012, 01:25 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by DeckApe - 12-05-2012, 04:10 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-05-2012, 04:52 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by TA Forbes - 12-05-2012, 05:34 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by jerryhawthorne - 12-05-2012, 05:54 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-06-2012, 02:08 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by jerryhawthorne - 12-06-2012, 02:22 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-06-2012, 02:31 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by jerryhawthorne - 12-06-2012, 04:01 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-06-2012, 04:11 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-06-2012, 04:13 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by jerryhawthorne - 12-06-2012, 04:31 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-06-2012, 05:26 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by jerryhawthorne - 12-06-2012, 08:58 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-06-2012, 11:33 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by jerryhawthorne - 12-07-2012, 01:09 AM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-07-2012, 11:20 AM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-07-2012, 11:30 AM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-07-2012, 11:32 AM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-07-2012, 11:49 AM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-07-2012, 11:55 AM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by idaho181 - 12-07-2012, 01:12 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by Ron Ramirez - 12-07-2012, 01:29 PM
RE: Philco 42-355 - by jerryhawthorne - 12-07-2012, 01:47 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)