04-22-2013, 06:57 PM
Sorry, I meant 1 mc apart!
Is the LO on this band going to be heard 455 kcs below, or above the "tuned" freq.? The signal I hear close to 10 Mhz DOES have an LO below, but not above, if so I think I have the fundamental spotted and zeroed in on 10 Mhz now. The image above at about 900 kcs is a lot stronger than I would expect however. Nearly as strong as the fundamental. I can actually hear WWV in both spots too. I don't expect to get it within a needles width accurate. Actually 50 to 200 kcs would be fine with me. Maybe I have it pegged now since I was looking for the upper LO instead of looking below (10000 - 455 = 9545).
Thanks,
Brian
Is the LO on this band going to be heard 455 kcs below, or above the "tuned" freq.? The signal I hear close to 10 Mhz DOES have an LO below, but not above, if so I think I have the fundamental spotted and zeroed in on 10 Mhz now. The image above at about 900 kcs is a lot stronger than I would expect however. Nearly as strong as the fundamental. I can actually hear WWV in both spots too. I don't expect to get it within a needles width accurate. Actually 50 to 200 kcs would be fine with me. Maybe I have it pegged now since I was looking for the upper LO instead of looking below (10000 - 455 = 9545).
Thanks,
Brian
