Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262

(01-16-2015, 01:34 AM)Arran Wrote:  I think it would take a side by side "shootout" to really narrow it down.

I agree. But since I do not own a Philco 118 or 650 console anymore, I had to rely on memory.

I was just revisiting the 9-S-262 schematic, and I think a better "apples to apples" comparison would be to compare the 9-S-262 to a Philco 144 or 630. Looking at the 9-S-262 schematic, it has separate mixer and oscillator tubes and separate 2nd detector and 1st audio amp tubes. It uses a tuning eye where Philco used shadowmeters. When you take out the eye tube, combine 6L7 and 6J5 functions into a 6A7, and combine 6H6 and 6F5 into a 6Q7 (75), your 9 tube radio becomes a 6 tube radio.

The 630X sounds good (as with the others I mentioned, I no longer own a 630X), but I would have to say the 9-S-262 sounds better.

I thought the Zenith speaker looked like a Magnavox, but I could be wrong. I think Magnavox became one of Philco's suppliers after 1938 when Philco stopped making their own speakers and began buying them from outside sources.

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-22-2014, 02:36 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by murf - 12-24-2014, 11:16 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-22-2014, 02:59 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-22-2014, 03:04 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-22-2014, 08:38 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 12-23-2014, 12:04 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-23-2014, 05:22 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-23-2014, 05:32 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 12-24-2014, 04:27 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-24-2014, 10:25 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-24-2014, 05:12 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-24-2014, 10:21 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-24-2014, 11:16 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-24-2014, 11:39 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-24-2014, 11:21 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 05:03 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 12-25-2014, 12:59 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 01:57 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 02:18 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 12-25-2014, 11:00 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 12-25-2014, 02:16 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-28-2014, 09:14 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-01-2015, 10:07 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 12-30-2014, 05:34 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 12-31-2014, 03:03 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-01-2015, 01:43 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by murf - 01-01-2015, 08:10 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-04-2015, 01:19 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-03-2015, 09:22 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-03-2015, 09:45 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-04-2015, 12:06 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-04-2015, 02:50 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-04-2015, 07:16 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by GarySP - 01-04-2015, 09:37 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-05-2015, 01:51 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 01-05-2015, 10:41 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-05-2015, 11:25 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-06-2015, 08:56 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 01-07-2015, 07:29 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-07-2015, 11:40 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-08-2015, 12:52 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-08-2015, 01:03 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-08-2015, 02:30 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-09-2015, 10:07 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-08-2015, 10:31 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-09-2015, 04:10 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 01-10-2015, 02:21 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Geoff - 01-10-2015, 02:17 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by sam - 01-10-2015, 06:10 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-10-2015, 09:52 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-15-2015, 09:28 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-16-2015, 01:34 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Ron Ramirez - 01-16-2015, 06:57 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 01:07 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 11:29 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-16-2015, 08:46 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-17-2015, 01:07 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-17-2015, 12:00 PM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by Arran - 01-18-2015, 12:53 AM
RE: Here we go with a Brand Z 9-S-262 - by morzh - 01-18-2015, 11:35 AM



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)