Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes)
#25

(04-08-2016, 07:30 AM)Madmurdok Wrote:  Wow! What fun! Don't ya just love it when "someone" has been monkeying around inside something before you get ahold of it. Might want to be sure he gets another tick on his electrocution counter Icon_lolno Glad you got it running right Mike. It's really a mess when the schematics are screwed up. Ok, maybe Kirk DIDN"T do it, but he looks so guilty. Especially in pajamas!!

I'd check for finger prints...

Joe

Matthew 16:26 "For what does it profit a man if he gain the whole world, yet lose his own soul?"


Messages In This Thread
DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by morzh - 04-05-2016, 09:18 PM
RE: 43 tubes - by Phlogiston - 04-05-2016, 10:19 PM
RE: 43 tubes - by morzh - 04-05-2016, 10:43 PM
RE: 43 tubes - by Arran - 04-06-2016, 03:01 AM
RE: 43 tubes - by morzh - 04-06-2016, 07:19 AM
RE: 43 tubes - by Phlogiston - 04-06-2016, 10:15 AM
RE: 43 tubes - by Phlogiston - 04-06-2016, 02:17 PM
RE: 43 tubes - by morzh - 04-06-2016, 06:43 PM
RE: 43 tubes - by Phlogiston - 04-06-2016, 07:31 PM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by morzh - 04-06-2016, 10:47 PM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by morzh - 04-07-2016, 10:38 AM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by morzh - 04-07-2016, 03:27 PM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by morzh - 04-07-2016, 04:04 PM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by morzh - 04-07-2016, 06:06 PM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by morzh - 04-07-2016, 10:14 PM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by Arran - 04-07-2016, 10:51 PM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by morzh - 04-08-2016, 07:09 AM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by TV MAN - 04-08-2016, 07:30 AM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by Joe Rossi - 04-09-2016, 01:21 PM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by morzh - 04-09-2016, 10:13 AM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by morzh - 04-09-2016, 05:13 PM
RE: DELCO 4052 ACDC (was 43 tubes) - by morzh - 04-10-2016, 06:52 PM



Users browsing this thread: