Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

6L6G vs 6L6GA
#11

If it has a listing of 1942 Philco models then it cannot be from the 1930s, it must be mid to late 1941. Icon_smile

Philco used the 6L6G tube in the 38-116 and 38-690, then not again until the 42-1016 and (I think) 42-1015. Even then it likely had no direct substitute at that time. I doubt that the KT66 was widely available in this country back then (although I could be wrong), and the 5881 may not have been developed yet (again, not certain without some research).

--
Ron Ramirez
Ferdinand IN


Messages In This Thread
6L6G vs 6L6GA - by WyTex - 01-17-2018, 02:25 PM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by morzh - 01-17-2018, 02:41 PM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by Radioroslyn - 01-17-2018, 03:01 PM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by jcassity - 01-17-2018, 04:35 PM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by Arran - 01-18-2018, 01:34 AM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by WyTex - 01-18-2018, 05:45 AM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by Arran - 01-18-2018, 11:49 PM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by Ron Ramirez - 01-19-2018, 06:10 AM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by WyTex - 01-19-2018, 11:36 AM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by WyTex - 01-19-2018, 11:45 AM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by Ron Ramirez - 01-19-2018, 12:36 PM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by David - 01-19-2018, 02:51 PM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by WyTex - 01-19-2018, 03:54 PM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by Ron Ramirez - 01-19-2018, 06:07 PM
RE: 6L6G vs 6L6GA - by WyTex - 01-21-2018, 04:21 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)